|
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=31&art_id=vn20100722072202879C545960
Lion trading the same as cow
trading for some
Tony Carnie
July 22 2010 at 09:42AM
A pending court case on South Africa's canned lion controversy
is expected to have far-reaching ramifications for local hunters
and several thousand lions - and possibly open a new and much
uglier can of worms.
In a nutshell, local lion-breeders have mounted a last-ditch
legal challenge to prevent the government from shutting down
their hunting and breeding industry. If they lose the case, the
captive-breeding/ hunting industry will have to shut down or go
underground and most of its members will be looking for new
jobs.
When this happens, lion breeders say, there will be no
alternative but to "euthanase" most of the captive-bred lion
population estimated at about 5 000 animals.
Local animal welfare groups say there are not enough zoos or
sanctuaries to accommodate so many lions and acknowledge most of
them will probably have to be destroyed.
There is also a possibility the government will grant the
lion-breeders a phasing-out or sunset period to wind up their
businesses and offer the last captive lions to hunters and other
takers. But there is also a much grimmer alternative - turning
lions into the equivalent of bone meal.
The notion that the government would tolerate such a proposal
seems outlandish and far-fetched, yet it is not illegal to
export and trade lion products, if traders can obtain permits.
David Newton, Joburg-based head of the international wildlife
trade monitoring network Traffic, says in theory there is
nothing to stop lion products being traded legally under the
provisions of the international Convention on Illegal Trade in
Endangered Species (Cites). Lions are classified under Cites
Appendix II, which affords a lower level of protection than is
given to the more endangered Asian tiger, which falls under
Appendix I.
In his opinion, international laws would not prohibit trading of
captive-bred lion bones. Asked if lion-breeders could exploit
this opportunity, Newton said: "I'm sure they will. There is
some interest in this already. Whether breeders choose to
acknowledge this or not is neither here nor there. Some traders
don't follow the animal rights view. For them it is just another
commodity... trading in lions would not be any different to
trading cows.
"We know there is a limited trade in lion bones already and this
is of great concern to us - especially if it is being driven by
the Asian markets. We also know tiger bone is in demand in Asia
and there have been some recent confiscations of intercepted
lion patella bones (kneecaps)."
Newton says wildlife intelligence sources indicate cat bone
traders in Asia could be prepared to accept lion bones as an
alternative to tiger bone, as the two big cat species are
closely related and also capable of interbreeding.
"So far we have not seen any lion bones in powdered form, and I
would be surprised to see that happening, because most traders
would want to be supplied with the real thing. Perhaps if they
really trusted the supplier they would accept powdered bones."
Asked for his opinion on whether trade in the products of
captive-bred lions might help ease hunting pressure on wild
lions, Newton said there were captive-breeding facilities, such
as the De Wildt cheetah-breeding centre, that had conservation
objectives.
"I'm not sure the captive-lion breeders help conservation. To
some extent they are creating a new market, so TRAFFIC does not
support tiger farming or lion farming where the final product is
bone. We think there is a risk that some animals will be mixed
up to create a new market.
"People in China have tried to farm tigers for some time, yet we
have not seen any improvement for wild tigers - and so the same
holds for South Africa. My feeling is that some farmers are
catering to hunters who could not care less where their lion
comes from."
As for lion-bone farming, Newton says this could increase the
pressure on wild lions but says the organisation does not have
enough information about this market and hopes to raise funds to
do a more detailed study.
"How do you know whether lion bones are coming from wild or
captive bred animals? How many wildlife officers can recognise a
lion bone? If you are going to allow something like this you
need to know what you are looking at."
In his opinion, local wildlife officials could be entitled to
sign a Cites export permit for lion bones if scientific experts
decided such trade was "not detrimental" to the species.
Another source cites a recent case in which the Free State
nature conservation agency allegedly issued a permit allowing
the export of lion bones to a neighbouring province. What rang
alarm bells was that the permit contained only English and
Chinese text, sparking concern that some lion breeders had
already made contact with Chinese intermediaries.
"My information is the Chinese will pass off the lion bones as
free-ranging tiger bones. If South Africa relaxes controls there
is no way to flood the Chinese bone medicine market because it's
so massive."
Last month the Endangered Wildlife Trust and other conservation
and animal welfare groups met Department of Environmental
Affairs officials and urged them to put regulations in place to
avert a further conservation crisis involving lion bones.
Sarel van der Merwe, chairman of the Kuruman-based African Lion
Working Group, also fears lion-breeders are poised to exploit
the potential lion bone trade option.
"If there is money to be made from bones they will find ways to
do it - or the trade will simply go underground. At the moment,
some of our concerns are based on suspicion that lion breeders,
zoos and safari parks from all over the world will find it
increasingly worthwhile to export bones, much like the illegal
trade in rhino horn.
Leigh Fletcher, a lion breeder from Sandhurst Safaris in North
West, testified in a recent trial that she had spent her life
feeding, rearing and doctoring lion cubs in much the same way as
farmers bred cattle. Her brother Clayton Fletcher will stand
trial in October for his alleged involvement in a criminal
syndicate that poached, procured and traded illegal rhino horn
throughout South Africa.
Van der Merwe says the African lion is already under severe
threat from habitat loss, disease, poisoning and human
persecution.
Compared with estimates of about 200 000 lions in Africa in
1975, Van der Merwe and Dutch researcher Hans Bauer believe the
continent's wild lion population has declined to between 16 000
and 30 000 animals.
Other researchers suggest a more optimistic figure of 47 000
lions. But regardless of the true total, Van der Merwe says the
entire African lion population would not fill a large city
soccer or rugby stadium.
This article was originally published on page 6 of Cape Times on
July 22, 2010 |